Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sclerosing adenosis of the breast: A retrospective review of cytologic features in conjunction with corresponding histologic features and radiologic findings

Uma R. Kundu, Ming Guo, Gene Landon, Yun Wu, Nour Sneige, Yun Gong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed 25 fine-needle aspiration cases of sclerosing adenosis of the breast in conjunction with histologic features of the paired core-needle biopsy and radiologic findings. The original cytologic diagnoses were benign (n = 19), focally atypical (n = 3), and suspicious for carcinoma (n = 3). The frequent features, although not specific, were low-to-moderate cellularity, bland epithelial cells that focally formed cohesive groups/tubules or occasionally discohesive clusters or individual cells, and fragments of dense fibrous stroma. Some tubules had an angulated configuration. Myoepithelial cells were present in all cases but were scant or absent in small epithelial groups. These cytologic features closely reflected the histologic appearances (ie, compressed and attenuated tubules and sclerotic stroma), but may cause overinterpretation on cytologic smears, especially when angulated tubules, discohesive or individual epithelial cells, scanty myoepithelial cells, and nuclear atypia are noted concurrently. Familiarity with its cytologic features may prevent false-positive diagnosis. Histologic confirmation is recommended for difficult cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-102
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume138
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Core
  • FNA
  • Fine-needle aspiration
  • Sclerosing adenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sclerosing adenosis of the breast: A retrospective review of cytologic features in conjunction with corresponding histologic features and radiologic findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this