FLAGS: A flexible and adaptive association test for gene sets using summary statistics

Jianfei Huang, Kai Wang, Peng Wei, Xiangtao Liu, Xiaoming Liu, Kai Tan, Eric Boerwinkle, Jamesb Potash, Shizhong Han

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used for identifying common variants associated with complex diseases. Despite remarkable success in uncovering many risk variants and providing novel insights into disease biology, genetic variants identified to date fail to explain the vast majority of the heritability for most complex diseases. One explanation is that there are still a large number of common variants that remain to be discovered, but their effect sizes are generally too small to be detected individually. Accordingly, gene set analysis of GWAS, which examines a group of functionally related genes, has been proposed as a complementary approach to single-marker analysis. Here, we propose a flexible and adaptive test for gene sets (FLAGS), using summary statistics. Extensive simulations showed that this method has an appropriate type I error rate and outperforms existing methods with increased power. As a proof of principle, through real data analyses of Crohns disease GWAS data and bipolar disorder GWAS meta-analysis results, we demonstrated the superior performance of FLAGS over several state-of-the-art association tests for gene sets. Our method allows for the more powerful application of gene set analysis to complex diseases, which will have broad use given that GWAS summary results are increasingly publicly available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-929
Number of pages11
JournalGenetics
Volume202
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Association
  • Complex disease
  • GWAS
  • Gene set
  • Summary statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'FLAGS: A flexible and adaptive association test for gene sets using summary statistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this