Folic acid supplementation and risk of colorectal neoplasia during long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Michael N. Passarelli, Elizabeth L. Barry, Judy R. Rees, Leila A. Mott, Dongyu Zhang, Dennis J. Ahnen, Robert S. Bresalier, Robert W. Haile, Gail McKeown-Eyssen, Dale C. Snover, Bernard F. Cole, John A. Baron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study previously found folic acid increased risk of advanced and multiple colorectal adenomas during a surveillance colonoscopy interval starting about 3 y after randomization. Objective: We conducted secondary analyses to evaluate folic acid effects with additional follow-up after treatment was stopped. Methods: In total, 1021 participants recently diagnosed with colorectal adenomas were randomly assigned to 1 mg/d of folic acid (n = 516) or placebo (n = 505), with or without aspirin, beginning 6 July 1994. The original 3-y treatment period was extended into a subsequent colonoscopy interval, but eventually stopped prematurely on 1 October 2004. With additional post-treatment follow-up, a total of 663 participants who extended treatment completed a second colonoscopic surveillance interval after the initial 3-y follow-up. In addition, 490 participants provided information regarding a subsequent surveillance colonoscopy occurring before completion of follow-up on 31 May 2012, including 325 who had agreed to extended treatment. Study endpoints included conventional adenomas, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), or colorectal cancer, and RRs with 95% CIs were adjusted for baseline characteristics associated with availability of follow-up. Results: Among those who extended treatment, any colorectal neoplasia was found in 118 (36%) participants assigned to placebo and 146 (43%) assigned to folic acid during the second surveillance interval (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.47; P = 0.06). Increased risk of SSA/P with extended folic acid supplementation was statistically significant during the second surveillance interval (RR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.02, 3.68; P = 0.04). There was no evidence of post-treatment effects for any colorectal neoplasia (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.28; P = 0.94), and the post-treatment effect for SSA/P was no longer statistically significant (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.59, 3.19; P = 0.46). Conclusions: Delayed treatment effects were not observed, but folic acid may increase SSA/P risk. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00272324.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)903-911
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume110
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Keywords

  • clinical trial
  • colorectal adenoma
  • colorectal cancer
  • folic acid
  • sessile serrated adenoma/polyp

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Folic acid supplementation and risk of colorectal neoplasia during long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this