Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Evidence, challenges and opportunities

Ian Porter, Daniela Gonçalves-Bradley, Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Chris Gibbons, Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli, Ray Fitzpatrick, Nick Black, Joanne Greenhalgh, Jose M. Valderas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

139 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of the status of a patient's health condition that come directly from the patient. While PRO measures are a well-developed technology with robust standards in research, their use for informing healthcare decisions is still poorly understood. We review relevant examples of their application in the provision of healthcare and examine the challenges associated with implementing PROs in clinical settings. We evaluate evidence for their use and examine barriers to their uptake, and present an evidence-based framework for the successful implementation of PROs in clinical practice. We discuss current and future developments for the use of PROs in clinical practice, such as individualized measurement and computer-adaptive testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-519
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • feedback
  • patient care management
  • patient-reported outcome
  • quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Evidence, challenges and opportunities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this