TY - JOUR
T1 - From Philadelphia-Negative to JAK2-Positive
T2 - Effect of Genetic Discovery on Risk Stratification and Management
AU - Pemmaraju, Naveen
AU - Moliterno, Alison R.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The 2005 discovery of the JAK2 mutation redefined the diagnosis and natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Most importantly, this improvement in the pathobiologic conceptualization has focused our evolution of this field from being defined as what it is not (e.g., Philadelphia [Ph]-negative) to what it is (e.g., JAK2-positive, CALR-positive) in the majority of MPN cases. In the ensuing 10 years, the field has experienced a paradigm shift in terms of understanding of the biologic basis of the development of MPNs, an explosion of knowledge of the genetics of MPNs, and has translated disease knowledge into effective targeted therapies. With greater uniformity and agreement on the diagnosis and differences among the individual MPNs, augmented by improved cytogenetic and molecular classification, attention has turned now to addressing the need for uniformity in risk stratification of patients in the clinic for both disease complications and disease transformation. This article will highlight the developments in the field with regard to risk stratification and prognostication in MPNs with focus on the clinical aspects of the patient who presents with either essential thrombocytosis (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), or myelofibrosis (MF).
AB - The 2005 discovery of the JAK2 mutation redefined the diagnosis and natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Most importantly, this improvement in the pathobiologic conceptualization has focused our evolution of this field from being defined as what it is not (e.g., Philadelphia [Ph]-negative) to what it is (e.g., JAK2-positive, CALR-positive) in the majority of MPN cases. In the ensuing 10 years, the field has experienced a paradigm shift in terms of understanding of the biologic basis of the development of MPNs, an explosion of knowledge of the genetics of MPNs, and has translated disease knowledge into effective targeted therapies. With greater uniformity and agreement on the diagnosis and differences among the individual MPNs, augmented by improved cytogenetic and molecular classification, attention has turned now to addressing the need for uniformity in risk stratification of patients in the clinic for both disease complications and disease transformation. This article will highlight the developments in the field with regard to risk stratification and prognostication in MPNs with focus on the clinical aspects of the patient who presents with either essential thrombocytosis (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), or myelofibrosis (MF).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003055731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003055731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.139
DO - 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.139
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25993152
AN - SCOPUS:85003055731
SN - 1548-8756
SP - 139
EP - 145
JO - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting
JF - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting
ER -