Hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation

A. Brouquet, J. N. Vauthey, B. D. Badgwell, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, S. A. Curley, E. K. Abdalla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The results of surgery for recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CLM) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have not been evaluated. Methods: From 1993 to 2009, data on patients who underwent resection or RFA for recurrent CLM were collected prospectively. Inclusion criteria for this study were RFA as initial treatment for CLM and resection of recurrent CLM after RFA. Postoperative results and oncological outcomes were analysed. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median number of tumours 1 (1-3), median size 2·8 (2·0-4·0) cm) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 had recurrence at the site of RFA only, two developed new lesions, whereas four had both recurrent and de novo metastases. At the time of resection, patients had a median of 1 (1-13) CLM with a median maximum tumour diameter of 5·0 (1·8-11·0) cm, significantly larger than at the time of RFA (P = 0·021). Ninety-day postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 46 per cent (13 of 28) and 7 per cent (2 of 28) respectively. After a median follow-up of 35 (0-70) months, 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 60 and 29 per cent respectively. Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen level over 5 ng/ml at the time of resection and a rectal primary tumour were associated with worse survival (P = 0·041 and P = 0·021 respectively). Conclusion: Resection for recurrence after RFA is associated with significant morbidity and modest long-term benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1009
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume98
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after radiofrequency ablation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this