High-dose fenretinide in oral leukoplakia

William N. William, J. Jack Lee, Scott M. Lippman, Jack W. Martin, Nitin Chakravarti, Hai T. Tran, Anita L. Sabichi, Edward S. Kim, Lei Feng, Reuben Lotan, Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

We previously showed that low-dose fenretinide (200 mg/d) had limited activity in retinoid-resistant oral leukoplakia (34% response rate) possibly because serum drug levels were insufficient to induce retinoid receptor-independent apoptosis. Therefore, we designed the single-arm phase Il trial reported here to investigate whether higher-dose fenretinide would improve leukoplakia response over that of our previous study. Leukoplakia patients received fenretinide (900 mg/m2 twice daily) in four 3-week cycles (1 week on drug followed by 2 weeks off). At week 12, clinical responses were determined and blood samples were collected for serum drug level assessments. A planned interim futility analysis led to early trial closure after the initial 15 (of 25 planned) patients because only 3 (20%) had a partial response (stopping rule: ≤4 responses in first 16 patients). Fenretinide was well tolerated - only one grade 3 adverse event (diarrhea) occurred. Serum fenretinide levels changed from 0 (baseline) to 0.122 ± 0.093 μmol/L (week 12). In correlative in vitro studies, high-dose fenretinide inhibited the growth of head and neck cancer cells more and oral leukoplakia cells less than did lower doses of fenretinide. This result is consistent with our clinical finding that high-dose fenretinide did not improve on the historical response rate of lower-dose fenreti-nide in our previous oral leukoplakia trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-26
Number of pages5
JournalCancer Prevention Research
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-dose fenretinide in oral leukoplakia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this