How different is invasive fusariosis in pediatric patients than in adults? A systematic review

Luana Rossato, Fabianne Carlesse, João Nobrega De Almeida, Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE of reviewTo investigate the peculiarities of invasive fusariosis (IF) in pediatric patients.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review to identify human cases of locally invasive and systemic fusariosis documented in children (up to 18 years) published between 1973 (first case report) and 2021.Recent findingsOne hundred and six cases were retrieved, and hematologic malignancy was reported in 64% (68/106) of the cases. The most frequent anatomic sites involved were skin 66% (70/106), blood 47% (50/106), and lungs 35% (37/106), bone and joint (8%, 09/106), and eye/central nervous system involvement (8%, 9/106). Fusarium solani, followed by Fusarium oxysporum, were the most commonly reported species. In disseminated fusariosis, relapsed or refractory baseline disease (P < 0.001, OR=10.555, CI 95% 3.552-31.365) was associated with poor outcome, whereas voriconazole-based therapy was associated with better prognosis (P = 0.04, OR = 0.273, CI 95% 0.076-0.978).SummaryHematologic malignancies and solid tumors requiring intensive immunosuppression are the main conditions related to IF in children where other organs than skin, blood, and lungs were frequently involved. Voriconazole therapy appears to be also effective in children with IF, despite the wide pharmacokinetic variability of this triazole in pediatric patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-626
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent opinion in infectious diseases
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How different is invasive fusariosis in pediatric patients than in adults? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this