Abstract
Here, we present a case in which the result of a maternity test was obscured due to two false indirect exclusions that occurred in two out of 15 genetic loci through the use of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The Identifiler kit failed to amplify allele 11 of the D5S818 system on the child and failed to capture the existence of allele 13 on the FGA system on both mother and child. The situation was remedied through use of the PowerPlex 16 PCR Amplification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) which used different primers with a different allele range than that of the Identifiler kit. Maternity was confirmed through sequencing and it was found that the failure of the Identifiler kit to amplify allele 11 on the D5S818 system was the result of an incompatibility to the primer-binding site due to a mutation that changed a guanine (G) into a thymine (T) 55 base pairs (bp) downstream of the repeat. The inability of the Identifiler kit to pick up allele 13 of the FGA system was due to the out-of-range location of the allele. Indirect exclusions can be misleading if they are not fully investigated since allele range as well as primer-binding affinity are two confounders that must be addressed to ensure accuracy of the test results.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 30-34 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Legal Medicine |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2011 |
Keywords
- D5S818
- FGA
- False indirect exclusion
- Primer-binding site
- Short tandem repeat
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects