Identification of dual false indirect exclusions on the D5S818 and FGA loci

Wenxiao Jiang, Margaret Kline, Peter Hu, Yue Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Here, we present a case in which the result of a maternity test was obscured due to two false indirect exclusions that occurred in two out of 15 genetic loci through the use of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The Identifiler kit failed to amplify allele 11 of the D5S818 system on the child and failed to capture the existence of allele 13 on the FGA system on both mother and child. The situation was remedied through use of the PowerPlex 16 PCR Amplification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) which used different primers with a different allele range than that of the Identifiler kit. Maternity was confirmed through sequencing and it was found that the failure of the Identifiler kit to amplify allele 11 on the D5S818 system was the result of an incompatibility to the primer-binding site due to a mutation that changed a guanine (G) into a thymine (T) 55 base pairs (bp) downstream of the repeat. The inability of the Identifiler kit to pick up allele 13 of the FGA system was due to the out-of-range location of the allele. Indirect exclusions can be misleading if they are not fully investigated since allele range as well as primer-binding affinity are two confounders that must be addressed to ensure accuracy of the test results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-34
Number of pages5
JournalLegal Medicine
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • D5S818
  • FGA
  • False indirect exclusion
  • Primer-binding site
  • Short tandem repeat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of dual false indirect exclusions on the D5S818 and FGA loci'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this