TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging characteristics of pathologically proven adrenal adenomas with myelolipomatous degeneration
T2 - Correlation with clinical and pathologic features
AU - Guccione, Jeffrey
AU - Soliman, Moataz
AU - Zhang, Miao
AU - Habra, Mouhammed Amir
AU - Collins, Katrina
AU - Zhao, Jianping
AU - Elsayes, Khaled M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objectives Adrenal adenoma with myelolipomatous degeneration (AMD) is a rarely reported and often overlooked entity. The aim of this study is to improve understanding of these lesions by characterizing the imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. Methods In the largest series to date, we report 11 nodules in 11 patients confirmed with a pathologic diagnosis of AMD. The available cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic features were reviewed by two radiologists and two pathologists, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data for each patient were obtained from the electronic medical records, when available. Results All 11 patients had a CT prior to resection or biopsy of the adrenal nodule, with five having received an adrenal mass protocol study. An MRI was available in three patients. The median size of the nodules on imaging was 4.5cm (range 2.8-8.7) and all but one had macroscopic fat. The largest focus of macroscopic fat had a median size of 0.7cm (range 0.2-1.6) and on average was 14.4% the size of the tumor, using greatest dimensions. Four (36.4%) patients had a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome prior to nodule resection. Conclusions Not all adrenal nodules with macroscopic fat on imaging are pure myelolipomas. An AMD should be considered, especially if the foci of fat are small and other features of an adenoma are present. Some may also be associated with Cushing syndrome. Advances in knowledge: Myelolipomatous degeneration within an adrenal adenoma has only rarely been previously reported with very few reports emphasizing the imaging features. There may be an association with cortisol hypersecretion and improved recognition of this entity could lead to changes in clinical management.
AB - Objectives Adrenal adenoma with myelolipomatous degeneration (AMD) is a rarely reported and often overlooked entity. The aim of this study is to improve understanding of these lesions by characterizing the imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. Methods In the largest series to date, we report 11 nodules in 11 patients confirmed with a pathologic diagnosis of AMD. The available cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic features were reviewed by two radiologists and two pathologists, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data for each patient were obtained from the electronic medical records, when available. Results All 11 patients had a CT prior to resection or biopsy of the adrenal nodule, with five having received an adrenal mass protocol study. An MRI was available in three patients. The median size of the nodules on imaging was 4.5cm (range 2.8-8.7) and all but one had macroscopic fat. The largest focus of macroscopic fat had a median size of 0.7cm (range 0.2-1.6) and on average was 14.4% the size of the tumor, using greatest dimensions. Four (36.4%) patients had a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome prior to nodule resection. Conclusions Not all adrenal nodules with macroscopic fat on imaging are pure myelolipomas. An AMD should be considered, especially if the foci of fat are small and other features of an adenoma are present. Some may also be associated with Cushing syndrome. Advances in knowledge: Myelolipomatous degeneration within an adrenal adenoma has only rarely been previously reported with very few reports emphasizing the imaging features. There may be an association with cortisol hypersecretion and improved recognition of this entity could lead to changes in clinical management.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121206586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121206586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20210555
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20210555
M3 - Article
C2 - 34623887
AN - SCOPUS:85121206586
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 95
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1129
M1 - 20210555
ER -