Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures

Tracy E. Spinks, Ronald Walters, Thomas W. Feeley, Heidi Wied Albrigh, Victoria S. Jordan, John Bingham, Thomas W. Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Historically, quality measures for cancer have followed a different route than overall quality measures in the health care system. Many specialized cancer treatment centers were exempt from standard reporting on quality measures because of the complexity of cancer. Additionally, it has been difficult to create meaningful quality measures for cancer because the disease can strike so many different organs; is discovered at and progresses through different stages; and is treated using different modalities, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Over the past decade the National Quality Forum, a nonprofit organization dedicated to bettering the quality of US health care, has endorsed measures of quality for cancer providers and patients. The Affordable Care Act of 2010, which has sections specific to cancer reporting, will also further the development and public reporting of cancer quality measures-important steps in improving the delivery of cancer care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)664-672
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this