in vitro thermo‐chemosensitivity screening of spontaneous human tumors: Significant potentiation for cisplatin but not adriamycin

Annamaria Calabro, S. Eva Singletary, Susan Tucker, Arthur Boddie, Gary Spitzer, Renato Cavaliere

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The in vitro thermal enhancement of Adriamycin (ADR) and Cisplatin (CDDP) was investigated in 18 surgical biopsy specimens of human tumors cultured in the Adhesive Tumor Cell Culture System. Experimental conditions were adopted to simulate “therapeutic” trials: (a) temperature of 37.0°C, 40.5°C or 42.5°C; (b) hyperthermic duration of 30, 60, or 120 min; and (c) 4‐dose drug range normalized to human bone marrow toxicity. Drug concentrations that inhibited 90% of tumor growth (IC90) at 37.0°C were compared to the IC90 at 40.5°C and 42.5°C, adjusted for the effect of heat alone. CDDP plus heat was a better combination than ADR plus heat, regardless of the temperature and the exposure duration: significant synergism (p < 0.001) occurred in 37% of heat‐CDDP combinations, as compared with 15% of heat‐ADR combinations, and antagonism was significantly lower (p < 0.001) for heat‐CDDP than for heat‐ADR (4.4% versus 21% of combinations, respectively). Within the CDDP group, higher temperature and longer heat exposure resulted in an increased incidence of chemosensitivity. No specific pattern of synergism was evident within the ADR group, but a trend toward a higher incidence of antagonistic effects with increasing hyperthermic duration was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-390
Number of pages6
JournalInternational journal of cancer
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'in vitro thermo‐chemosensitivity screening of spontaneous human tumors: Significant potentiation for cisplatin but not adriamycin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this