TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of source parameters on large-field electron beam profiles calculated using Monte Carlo methods
AU - Weinberg, Rebecca
AU - Antolak, John A.
AU - Starkschall, George
AU - Kudchadker, Rajat J.
AU - Allen White, R.
AU - Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
PY - 2009/1/7
Y1 - 2009/1/7
N2 - The purpose of this paper was to study the source model for a Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from a medical linear accelerator. In a prior study, a non-divergent Gaussian source with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.15 cm was successful in predicting relative dose distributions for electron beams with applicators. However, for large fields with the applicator removed, discrepancies were found between measured and calculated profiles, particularly in the shoulder region. In this work, the source was changed to a divergent Gaussian spatial distribution and the FWHM parameter was varied to produce better agreement with measured data. The influence of the FWHM source parameter on profiles was observed at multiple locations in the simulation geometry including in-air fluence profiles at a 95 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD), percent depth dose profiles and off-axis profiles (OARs) in a water phantom for two SSDs, 80 and 100 cm. For a 6 MeV 40 × 40 cm2 OAR profile, discrepancies in the shoulder region were reduced from 15% to 4% using a FWHM value of 0.45 cm. The optimal FWHM values for the other energies were 0.45 cm for 9 MeV, 0.22 for 12 MeV, 0.25 for 16 MeV and 0.2 cm for 20 MeV. Although this range of values was larger than measured focal spot sizes reported by other researchers, using the increased FWHM values improved the fit at most locations in the simulation geometry, giving confidence that the model could be used with a variety of SSDs and field sizes.
AB - The purpose of this paper was to study the source model for a Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from a medical linear accelerator. In a prior study, a non-divergent Gaussian source with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.15 cm was successful in predicting relative dose distributions for electron beams with applicators. However, for large fields with the applicator removed, discrepancies were found between measured and calculated profiles, particularly in the shoulder region. In this work, the source was changed to a divergent Gaussian spatial distribution and the FWHM parameter was varied to produce better agreement with measured data. The influence of the FWHM source parameter on profiles was observed at multiple locations in the simulation geometry including in-air fluence profiles at a 95 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD), percent depth dose profiles and off-axis profiles (OARs) in a water phantom for two SSDs, 80 and 100 cm. For a 6 MeV 40 × 40 cm2 OAR profile, discrepancies in the shoulder region were reduced from 15% to 4% using a FWHM value of 0.45 cm. The optimal FWHM values for the other energies were 0.45 cm for 9 MeV, 0.22 for 12 MeV, 0.25 for 16 MeV and 0.2 cm for 20 MeV. Although this range of values was larger than measured focal spot sizes reported by other researchers, using the increased FWHM values improved the fit at most locations in the simulation geometry, giving confidence that the model could be used with a variety of SSDs and field sizes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149229418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149229418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/007
DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/007
M3 - Article
C2 - 19075360
AN - SCOPUS:58149229418
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 54
SP - 105
EP - 116
JO - Physics in medicine and biology
JF - Physics in medicine and biology
IS - 1
ER -