Inverse decision theory: Characterizing losses for a decision rule with applications in cervical cancer screening

Richard J. Swartz, Dennis D. Cox, Scott B. Cantor, Kalatu Davies, Michele Follen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Identifying an optimal decision rule using Bayesian decision theory requires priors, likelihoods, and losses. In many medical settings, we can develop priors and likelihoods, but specifying losses can be difficult, especially when considering both patient outcomes and economic costs. If there is a widely accepted treatment strategy, then we can consider the inverse problem and find a region in the space of losses where the procedure is optimal. We call this approach inverse decision theory (IDT). We apply IDT to the standard of care for diagnosis and treatment of precancerous lesions of the cervix, and consider an alternative procedure that has been proposed. We use a Bayesian approach to estimate the probabilities associated with the diagnostic tests and make inferences about the region in loss space where these medical procedures are optimal. In particular, we find evidence supporting the current standard of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Statistical Association
Volume101
Issue number473
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • Bayesian decision theory
  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Cost-benefit ratio
  • Medical decision making
  • Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inverse decision theory: Characterizing losses for a decision rule with applications in cervical cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this