It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

Rajat Bhattacharya; Lee M. Ellis

doi:10.1002/bies.201700185

It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

Rajat Bhattacharya, Lee M. Ellis

Surgical Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	1700185
Journal	BioEssays
Volume	40
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201700185
State	Published - Jan 2018

Keywords

peer review
publication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Access to Document

10.1002/bies.201700185

Cite this

@article{eddf6d326d4a4229b4565e085777e878,

title = "It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research",

abstract = "Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.",

keywords = "peer review, publication",

author = "Rajat Bhattacharya and Ellis, {Lee M.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1002/bies.201700185",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "40",

journal = "BioEssays",

issn = "0265-9247",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

AU - Bhattacharya, Rajat

AU - Ellis, Lee M.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.

AB - Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.

KW - peer review

KW - publication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038351182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038351182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bies.201700185

DO - 10.1002/bies.201700185

M3 - Article

C2 - 29226979

AN - SCOPUS:85038351182

SN - 0265-9247

VL - 40

JO - BioEssays

JF - BioEssays

IS - 1

M1 - 1700185

ER -

It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this