Just-in-Time Decision Making: Preliminary Findings of a Goals of Care Rapid Response Team

Donna S. Zhukovsky, Yvonne Heung, Parema Enriquez, Nelda Itzep, Zhanni Lu, Nico Nortje, Penny Stanton, Angelique Wong, Eduardo Bruera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: The COVID-19 pandemic placed the issue of resource utilization front and center. Our comprehensive cancer center developed a Goals of Care Rapid Response Team (GOC RRT) to optimize resource utilization balanced with goal-concordant patient care. Objectives: Primary study objective was to evaluate feasibility of the GOC RRT by describing the frequency of consultations that occurred from those requested. Secondary objectives included adherence to consultation processes in terms of core team member participation and preliminary efficacy in limiting care escalation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients referred to GOC RRT (3/23/2020–9/30/2020). Analysis was descriptive. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact or Chi-Square tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: A total of 89 patients were referred. Eighty-five percent (76 of 89) underwent a total of 95 consultations. Median (range) patient age was 61 (49, 69) years, 54% (48 of 89) male, 19% (17 of 89) Hispanic, 48% (43/89) White, 73% (65 of 89) married/partnered and 66% (59 of 89) Christian. Hematologic malignancies and solid tumors were evenly balanced (53% [47/89] vs. 47% [42 of 89, P = 0.199]). Most patients (82%, 73 of 89) had metastatic disease or relapsed leukemia. Seven percent (6 of 89) had confirmed COVID-19. Sixty-nine percent (61 of 89) died during the index hospitalization. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic or clinical characteristics among groups (no consultation, 1 consultation, >1 consultation). Core team members were present at 64% (61 of 95) of consultations. Care limitation occurred in 74% (56 of 76) of patients. Conclusion: GOC RRT consultations were feasible and associated with care limitation. Adherence to core team participation was fair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e337-e343
JournalJournal of pain and symptom management
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • advance care planning
  • care limitation
  • family meetings
  • goal-concordant care
  • Goals of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Just-in-Time Decision Making: Preliminary Findings of a Goals of Care Rapid Response Team'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this