Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Experience in 60 cases

Gordon A. Brown, Surena F. Matin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the factors associated with better outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 36 men and 24 women aged 31 to 80 years (mean 60 years) in whom LPN was attempted at our institution over a 3.5-year period. Baseline patient characteristics and operative, pathologic, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The median duration of follow-up was 14.2 months (range 1-38 months). Results: The median pathologic tumor size was 2.1 cm (range 0.7-6.0 cm). Final pathologic review revealed renal-cell carcinoma in 73% of patients. Six patients (10%) required conversion to either an open partial nephrectomy or a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Dense perinephric adipose tissue in the setting of a small renal tumor and unanticipated multifocal disease were factors associated with surgical conversion. The median overall estimated blood loss was 112 mL, and the median warm-ischemia time was 30 minutes. Blood loss was greater in patients who did not undergo hilar clamping (467 v 65 mL; P = 0.008). Conclusion: Factors influencing successful LPN outcomes include selecting a tumor commensurate with the surgeon's laparoscopic experience, performing routine hilar clamping, adjunctive use of hemostatic agents, and renal-parenchymal suture ligation. The presence of thick, fibrotic perinephric fat overlying a small tumor increases the technical difficulty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-74
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Experience in 60 cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this