Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach

Surena F. Matin, Inderbir S. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy can be efficaciously performed by either the transperitoneal or the retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach. The primary indication for selecting one approach over another has historically depended on the individual surgeon’s experience and training. With either technique, laparoscopy adheres to established surgical oncologic principles of wide specimen mobilization and early vascular control. This article reviews the history, contraindications, anatomic considerations, patient preparation, and surgical technique of these two laparoscopic approaches. A salient summary of the worldwide experience with these procedures is presented, as well as a brief synopsis of controversial arguments favoring specimen morcellation versus intact extraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-171
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent urology reports
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this