Launching a virtual decision lab: Development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform

Aubri S. Hoffman, Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Annette M. O'Connor, Robert J. Volk, Ivan M. Tomek, Steven B. Andrews, Stephen J. Bartels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Over 100 trials show that patient decision aids effectively improve patients' information comprehension and values-based decision making. However, gaps remain in our understanding of several fundamental and applied questions, particularly related to the design of interactive, personalized decision aids. This paper describes an interdisciplinary development process for, and early field testing of, a web-based patient decision support research platform, or virtual decision lab, to address these questions. Methods: An interdisciplinary stakeholder panel designed the web-based research platform with three components: a) an introduction to shared decision making, b) a web-based patient decision aid, and c) interactive data collection items. Iterative focus groups provided feedback on paper drafts and online prototypes. A field test assessed a) feasibility for using the research platform, in terms of recruitment, usage, and acceptability; and b) feasibility of using the web-based decision aid component, compared to performance of a videobooklet decision aid in clinical care. Results: This interdisciplinary, theory-based, patient-centered design approach produced a prototype for field-testing in six months. Participants (n∈=∈126) reported that: the decision aid component was easy to use (98%), information was clear (90%), the length was appropriate (100%), it was appropriately detailed (90%), and it held their interest (97%). They spent a mean of 36 minutes using the decision aid and 100% preferred using their home/library computer. Participants scored a mean of 75% correct on the Decision Quality, Knowledge Subscale, and 74 out of 100 on the Preparation for Decision Making Scale. Completing the web-based decision aid reduced mean Decisional Conflict scores from 31.1 to 19.5 (p∈<∈0.01). Conclusions: Combining decision science and health informatics approaches facilitated rapid development of a web-based patient decision support research platform that was feasible for use in research studies in terms of recruitment, acceptability, and usage. Within this platform, the web-based decision aid component performed comparably with the videobooklet decision aid used in clinical practice. Future studies may use this interactive research platform to study patients' decision making processes in real-time, explore interdisciplinary approaches to designing web-based decision aids, and test strategies for tailoring decision support to meet patients' needs and preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number112
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2014

Keywords

  • Consumer health informatics
  • Decision support
  • Decision technology
  • Development
  • Informed patient choice
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Patient decision aid
  • Patient-centered
  • Shared decision making
  • User-centered
  • Web-based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Launching a virtual decision lab: Development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this