Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care (versus usual care) for people with mental-physical multimorbidity: Cluster-randomised trial

Elizabeth M. Camacho, Linda M. Davies, Mark Hann, Nicola Small, Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Clare Baguely, Linda Gask, Chris M. Dickens, Karina Lovell, Waquas Waheed, Chris J. Gibbons, Peter Coventry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Collaborative care can support the treatment of depression in people with long-term conditions, but long-term benefits and costs are unknown. Aims To explore the long-term (24-month) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care in people with mental-physical multimorbidity. Method A cluster randomised trial compared collaborative care (integrated physical and mental healthcare) with usual care for depression alongside diabetes and/or coronary heart disease. Depression symptoms were measured by the symptom checklist-depression scale (SCL-D13). The economic evaluation was from the perspective of the English National Health Service. Results 191 participants were allocated to collaborative care and 196 to usual care. At 24 months, the mean SCL-D13 score was 0.27 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.06) lower in the collaborative care group alongside a gain of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The cost per QALY gained was £13 069. Conclusions In the long term, collaborative care reduces depression and is potentially cost-effective at internationally accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-463
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume213
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care (versus usual care) for people with mental-physical multimorbidity: Cluster-randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this