Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Experienced Graft Failure Postallogeneic Progenitor Cell Transplantation. Results of a Single Institution Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

The long-term outcome of graft failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not been well described. To fill this knowledge gap we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with graft failure over a 10-year time period in a single institution. Cases were included for analysis if they had failed to achieve an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 500/μL or more by 28 days post-SCT or 42 days after cord blood transplantation (primary graft failure); had a decrease in their ANC to <500/mL for 3 consecutive days after having achieved neutrophil engraftment (secondary graft failure); or failed to have evidence of at least 5% or more donor cell engraftment (primary graft failure with autologous reconstitution). Among 1726 patients who underwent allografts from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2000, we identified 68 patients with graft failure. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 31%, 24%, and 15%. A diagnosis of acute leukemia was a significant predictor for poor survival on multivariate analysis. We conclude that graft failure is an uncommon complication postallogeneic SCT, and is associated with poor outcomes. Collection of autologous stem cells prior to high-risk allografting can salvage a fraction of patients and lead to prolonged survivals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)859-866
Number of pages8
JournalBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Keywords

  • Allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • Graft failure
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Experienced Graft Failure Postallogeneic Progenitor Cell Transplantation. Results of a Single Institution Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this