Machine learning helps identifying volume-confounding effects in radiomics

Alberto Traverso, Michal Kazmierski, Ivan Zhovannik, Mattea Welch, Leonard Wee, David Jaffray, Andre Dekker, Andrew Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Highlighting the risk of biases in radiomics-based models will help improve their quality and increase usage as decision support systems in the clinic. In this study we use machine learning-based methods to identify the presence of volume-confounding effects in radiomics features. Methods 841 radiomics features were extracted from two retrospective publicly available datasets of lung and head neck cancers using open source software. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) identified relations between radiomics and clinical outcomes (overall survival). Bootstrapping techniques with logistic regression verified features’ prognostic power and robustness. Results Over 80% of the features had large pairwise correlations. Nearly 30% of the features presented strong correlations with tumor volume. Using volume-independent features for clustering and PCA did not allow risk stratification of patients. Clinical predictors outperformed radiomics features in bootstrapping and logistic regression. Conclusions The adoption of safeguards in radiomics is imperative to improve the quality of radiomics studies. We proposed machine learning (ML) – based methods for robust radiomics signatures development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Head and neck
  • Lung
  • Machine learning
  • Predictions
  • Radiomics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • General Physics and Astronomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning helps identifying volume-confounding effects in radiomics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this