TY - JOUR
T1 - Mammography Capacity. Impact on Screening Rates and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis
AU - Elting, Linda S.
AU - Cooksley, Catherine D.
AU - Bekele, B. Nebiyou
AU - Giordano, Sharon H.
AU - Shih, Ya Chen Tina
AU - Lovell, Kelly K.
AU - Avritscher, Elenir B.C.
AU - Theriault, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported in part by grant DISP0707435 from Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Susan G. Komen for the Cure had no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
PY - 2009/8
Y1 - 2009/8
N2 - Background: Mammography capacity in the U.S. reportedly is adequate, but has not been examined in nonmetropolitan areas. This study examined the relationships between in-county mammography facilities and rates of mammography screening and late-stage diagnosis of breast cancers. Methods: The association between a mammography facility in the county of residence (2002-2004) and the odds of screening within 2 years were examined (in 2007) among Texas women aged >40 years who responded to the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, using multivariate logistic regression to control for age, race, ethnicity, education, income, self-reported health, insurance, and usual source of care. Similarly, the association between an in-county mammography facility and the odds of diagnosis with locally advanced or disseminated disease was examined among Texas women aged >40 years who developed breast cancer in 2004. Results: Half of the 254 counties in Texas had no mammography facility. After controlling for confounding factors, an in-county facility was associated with significantly higher odds of screening (OR=3.27; p=0.03) and lower odds of late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis (OR=0.36; 95% CI=0.26-0.51; p<0.001). The risks of late-stage diagnosis were higher for African-American women (OR=1.52; 95% CI=1.22-1.89; p<0.001) and Hispanic women (OR=1.23; 95% CI=0.99-1.53; p=0.06) than for white women. Conclusions: Although mammography capacity in the U.S. may be adequate on average, the unequal distribution of facilities results in large rural areas without facilities. Screening rates in these areas are suboptimal and are associated with late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer.
AB - Background: Mammography capacity in the U.S. reportedly is adequate, but has not been examined in nonmetropolitan areas. This study examined the relationships between in-county mammography facilities and rates of mammography screening and late-stage diagnosis of breast cancers. Methods: The association between a mammography facility in the county of residence (2002-2004) and the odds of screening within 2 years were examined (in 2007) among Texas women aged >40 years who responded to the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, using multivariate logistic regression to control for age, race, ethnicity, education, income, self-reported health, insurance, and usual source of care. Similarly, the association between an in-county mammography facility and the odds of diagnosis with locally advanced or disseminated disease was examined among Texas women aged >40 years who developed breast cancer in 2004. Results: Half of the 254 counties in Texas had no mammography facility. After controlling for confounding factors, an in-county facility was associated with significantly higher odds of screening (OR=3.27; p=0.03) and lower odds of late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis (OR=0.36; 95% CI=0.26-0.51; p<0.001). The risks of late-stage diagnosis were higher for African-American women (OR=1.52; 95% CI=1.22-1.89; p<0.001) and Hispanic women (OR=1.23; 95% CI=0.99-1.53; p=0.06) than for white women. Conclusions: Although mammography capacity in the U.S. may be adequate on average, the unequal distribution of facilities results in large rural areas without facilities. Screening rates in these areas are suboptimal and are associated with late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649604559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649604559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.017
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 19524392
AN - SCOPUS:67649604559
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 37
SP - 102
EP - 108
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -