Abstract
Background. Palatal obturators and microvascular free flaps are both used to treat patients with maxillectomy defects, however, the optimal technique remains controversial. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 113 patients undergoing maxillectomy for cancer was performed. Seventy-three patients received an obturator and 40 patients were reconstructed with a free flap. Results. Speech intelligibility and postoperative diet were comparable between the obturator and free flap groups, except in cases of extensive (>50%) palatal defects, where free flap reconstruction was superior in both aspects (p = .019 and p = .043, respectively). The average time for presenting with a local recurrence in advanced cancer involving the palate was comparable in both groups (p = .33). Conclusion. Moderate-sized maxillectomy defects involving the palate can be successfully treated with either an obturator or free flap reconstruction. Extensive defects have a better functional outcome with free flaps. Evidence does not suggest that free flap reconstructions delay diagnosis of local recurrences.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 860-868 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Head and Neck |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2010 |
Keywords
- Head and neck cancer
- Maxillectomies
- Microvascular free flap
- Obturator
- Prosthesis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Otorhinolaryngology