TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma
AU - Ho, Joel
AU - Mattei, Jane
AU - Tetzlaff, Michael
AU - Williams, Michelle D.
AU - Davies, Michael A.
AU - Diab, Adi
AU - Oliva, Isabella C.Glitza
AU - McQuade, Jennifer
AU - Patel, Sapna P.
AU - Tawbi, Hussein
AU - Wong, Michael K.
AU - Fisher, Sarah B.
AU - Hanna, Ehab
AU - Keung, Emily Z.
AU - Ross, Merrick
AU - Weiser, Roi
AU - Su, Shirley Y.
AU - Frumovitz, Michael
AU - Meyer, Larissa A.
AU - Jazaeri, Amir
AU - Pettaway, Curtis A.
AU - Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh
AU - Bishop, Andrew J.
AU - Mitra, Devarati
AU - Farooqi, Ahsan
AU - Bassett, Roland
AU - Faria, Silvana
AU - Nagarajan, Priyadharsini
AU - Amaria, Rodabe N.
N1 - Funding Information:
JH and RW were employed by MD Anderson Cancer Center. MDW, MAD, AD, IG, JMc, SP, HT, MKW, SFi, EH, EK, MR, SS, MF, LAM, AJ, CP, AG, AB, DM, AF, RB, SFa, PN and RA are employed by MD Anderson Cancer Center. MT is employed by University of California San Francisco. JM is employed by Hospital Moinhos de Vento. MAD is supported by the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation, the AIM at Melanoma Foundation, the NIH/NCI 1 P50 CA221703-02, the American Cancer Society and the Melanoma Research Alliance, Cancer Fighters of Houston, the Anne and John Mendelsohn Chair for Cancer Research, and philanthropic contributions to the Melanoma Moon Shots Program of MD Anderson. MAD has been a consultant to Roche/Genentech, Array, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, GSK, Sanofi-Aventis, Vaccinex, Apexigen, Eisai, Iovance, and ABM Therapeutics, and he has been the PI of research grants to MD Anderson by Roche/Genentech, GSK, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, Myriad, Oncothyreon, ABM Therapeutics, and LEAD Pharma. MAD receives institutional clinical trial support outside the submitted work from Pfizer. LAM receives research funding from AstraZeneca for unrelated research. PN receives grant from Melanoma Research Alliance (# 570806). MW is a consultant and serves on scientific advisory board for Bayer. MF is a consultant for Stryker and Seagen and receives research funding from AkesoBio and GSK. SP reports: Institutional clinical trial support outside the submitted work from Bristol Myers Squibb, Foghorn Therapeutics, Ideaya, InxMed, Lyvgen, Novartis, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Seagen, Syntrix Bio, TriSalus Life Sciences and advisory board, steering committee, data safety monitoring board, and consulting fees outside the submitted work from: Advance Knowledge in Healthcare, Cardinal Health, Castle Biosciences, Delcath, Immunocore, Novartis, TriSalus Life Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb. The handling editor RC declared a past co-authorship with the author SP. AJ has stock options from Avenge Bio and Green Fire Bio. He reports advisory fees from Macrogenics, GLG, Guidepoint, NuProbe, AvengeBio, Green Fire Bio, GI Innovation, Theolytics, Two XAR. He reports clinical trial funding to Institution from BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca, Iovance, Immatics, Aravive, Alaunos, Xencor, Avenge Bio, and Macrogenics. CP is a consultant for UptoDate Penile Cancer Series, Wolters Kluwer Publisher. IG receives research funding from BMS, MERCK, and Pfizer and serves in consulting roles or advisory board in BMS, Novartis, LEAL Therapeutics. RA receives research support from Novartis, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Iovance and Obsidian; consultancy for Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Iovance.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Ho, Mattei, Tetzlaff, Williams, Davies, Diab, Oliva, McQuade, Patel, Tawbi, Wong, Fisher, Hanna, Keung, Ross, Weiser, Su, Frumovitz, Meyer, Jazaeri, Pettaway, Guadagnolo, Bishop, Mitra, Farooqi, Bassett, Faria, Nagarajan and Amaria.
PY - 2022/10/17
Y1 - 2022/10/17
N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM. Method: Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities. Results: We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients.
AB - Background: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM. Method: Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities. Results: We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients.
KW - immunotherapy
KW - melanoma
KW - mucosal melanoma
KW - neoadjuvant
KW - resectable
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140980938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140980938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2022.1001150
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2022.1001150
M3 - Article
C2 - 36324592
AN - SCOPUS:85140980938
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 1001150
ER -