Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer

Peter C. Black, Gordon A. Brown, H. Barton Grossman, Colin P. Dinney

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The 30-45% failure rate after radical cystoprostatectomy mandates that we explore and optimize multimodal therapy to achieve better disease control in these patients. Cisplatin-based multi-agent combination chemotherapy has been used with success in metastatic disease and has therefore also been introduced in patients with high-risk but non-metastatic bladder cancer. There is now convincing evidence that chemotherapy given pre-operatively can improve survival in these patients. In this review we establish the need for peri-operative chemotherapy in bladder cancer patients and summarize the evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The advantages and disadvantages of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy are discussed, and the main shortcomings of both - treatment-related toxicity and the inability to prospectively identify likely responders - are presented. Finally, a risk-adapted approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is presented, whereby the highest risk patients are offered treatment while those unlikely to benefit are spared the treatment-related toxicity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-542
Number of pages12
JournalWorld journal of urology
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Bladder cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Cystectomy
  • Neoadjuvant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this