Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yajing Wu, Vivek Verma, Carl M. Gay, Yujia Chen, Fei Liang, Qiang Lin, Jianing Wang, Wei Zhang, Zhouguang Hui, Min Zhao, Jun Wang, Joe Y. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) is a rapidly emerging paradigm for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this PRISMA/MOOSE/PICOD-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to assess the safety and efficacy of nIT, (2) to compare the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) versus chemotherapy alone (nCT), and (3) to explore predictors of pathologic response with nIT and their association with outcomes. Methods: Eligibility was resectable stage I–III NSCLC and the receipt of programmed death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 inhibitors before resection; other forms and modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. For statistical analysis, the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model was used, depending on the heterogeneity (I2). Results: Sixty-six articles met the criteria (eight randomized studies, 39 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 19 retrospective studies). The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 28.1%. The estimated grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 18.0%. Compared with nCT, nCIT achieved higher rates of pCR (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49–12.97; p <.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38–0.67; p <.001), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36–0.74; p =.0003) but yielded similar toxicity rates (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67–1.52; p =.97). The results remained robust on sensitivity analysis when all retrospective publications were removed. pCR was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.15–0.43; p <.001) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10–0.67; p =.005). PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) were more likely to achieve a pCR (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.22–7.03; p =.02). Conclusions: In patients with advanced resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was safe and efficacious. nCIT improved pathologic response rates and PFS/OS over nCT, particularly in patients who had tumors that expressed PD-L1, without increasing toxicities. Plain Language Summary: This meta-analysis of 66 studies showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and efficacious. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoimmunotherapy improved pathologic response rates and survival, particularly for patients who had tumors that expressed programmed cell death ligand-1, without increasing toxicities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1969-1985
Number of pages17
JournalCancer
Volume129
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2023

Keywords

  • immunotherapy
  • neoadjuvant
  • non-small cell lung cancer
  • pathologic response
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this