Opioid switching: A systematic and critical review

Sebastiano Mercadante, Eduardo Bruera

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    217 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Cancer patients with pain may not respond to increasing doses of opioids because they develop adverse effects before achieving an acceptable analgesia, or the analgesic response is poor, despite a rapid dose escalation. Opioid switching may significantly improve the balance between analgesia and adverse effects. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature on opioid switching. According to available data, opioid switching results in clinical improvement in more than 50% of patients with chronic pain with poor response to one opioid. However, data are based on open studies or small case series. Reasons for switching may influence the dose of the alternative drug. Opioid conversion should not be a mere mathematical calculation, but just a part of a more comprehensive evaluation of pain, adverse effect intensity, comorbidities, and concomitant drugs. The process of reaching an optimal dose should be highly individualized, particularly when patients are switched from high doses of opioids, given the wide conversion ratios reported in literature.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)304-315
    Number of pages12
    JournalCancer treatment reviews
    Volume32
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2006

    Keywords

    • Cancer pain
    • Chronic pain
    • Opioid switching
    • Palliative care

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Opioid switching: A systematic and critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this