Patient-Reported Outcomes Accurately Measure the Value of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery Poster abstract presented at the 123rd Annual Western Surgical Association Meeting, Napa Valley, CA, November 2015.

Ryan W. Day, Charles S. Cleeland, Xin S. Wang, Sharon Fielder, John Calhoun, Claudius Conrad, Jean Nicolas Vauthey, Vijaya Gottumukkala, Thomas A. Aloia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Enhanced recovery (ER) pathways have become increasingly integrated into surgical practice. Studies that compare ER and traditional pathways often focus on outcomes confined to inpatient hospitalization and rarely assess a patient's functional recovery. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes for patients treated on an Enhanced Recovery in Liver Surgery (ERLS) pathway vs a traditional pathway. Study Design One hundred and eighteen hepatectomy patients rated symptom severity and life interference using the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory preoperatively and postoperatively at every outpatient visit until 31 days after surgery. The ERLS protocol included patient education, narcotic-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, diet advancement, restrictive fluid administration, early ambulation, and avoidance of drains and tubes. Results Seventy-five ERLS pathway patients were clinically comparable with 43 patients simultaneously treated on a traditional pathway. The ERLS patients reported lower immediate postoperative pain scores and experienced fewer complications and decreased length of stay. As measured by symptom burden on life interference, ERLS patients were more likely to return to baseline functional status in a shorter time interval. The only independent predictor of faster return to baseline interference levels was treatment on an ERLS pathway (p = 0.021; odds ratio = 2.62). In addition, ERLS pathway patients were more likely to return to intended oncologic therapy (95% vs 87%) at a shorter time interval compared to patients on the traditional pathway (44.7 vs 60.2 days). Conclusions In oncologic liver surgery, enhanced recovery's primary mechanism of action is reduction in life interference by postoperative surgical symptoms, allowing patients to return sooner to normal function and adjuvant cancer therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1023-1030.e2
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume221
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Abbreviations and Acronyms ER enhanced recovery
  • ERLS Enhanced Recovery in Liver Surgery
  • GI gastrointestinal
  • MDASI-GI MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, gastrointestinal version
  • PRO patient-reported outcomes
  • RIOT return to intended oncologic therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-Reported Outcomes Accurately Measure the Value of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery Poster abstract presented at the 123rd Annual Western Surgical Association Meeting, Napa Valley, CA, November 2015.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this