Patient-reported Quality of Life after Breast-conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy Versus Mastectomy and Reconstruction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes in breast cancer survivors who received breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (BCS+RT) with those who received a mastectomy and reconstructive surgery (Mast+Recon) without radiotherapy and identify other important factors. Background: The long-term differences in patient-reported QOL outcomes following BCS+RT and Mast+Recon are not well understood. Methods: We identified patients from the Texas Cancer Registry with stage 0-II breast cancer diagnosed in 2009-2014 after BCS+RT or Mast+Recon without radiotherapy. Sampling was stratified by age and race and ethnicity. A paper survey was sent to 4800 patients which included validated BREAST-Q and PROMIS modules. Multivariable linear regression models were implemented for each outcome. Minimal clinically important difference for BREAST-Q and PROMIS modules, respectively, was 4 points and 2 points. Results: Of 1215 respondents (25.3% response rate), 631 received BCS+RT and 584 received Mast+Recon. The median interval from diagnosis to survey completion was 9 years. In adjusted analysis, Mast+Recon was associated with worse BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being (effect size: -3.80, P=0.04) and sexual well-being (effect size: -5.41, P=0.02), but better PROMIS physical function (effect size: 0.54, P=0.03) and similar BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts, physical well-being, and PROMIS upper extremity function (P>0.05) compared with BCS+RT. Only the difference in sexual well-being reached clinical significance. Older (≥65) patients receiving BCS+RT and younger (<50) patients receiving autologous Mast+Recon typically reported higher QOL scores. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with detriments to multiple QOL domains. Conclusions: Patients who underwent Mast+Recon reported worse long-term sexual well-being compared with BCS+RT. Older patients derived a greater benefit from BCS+RT, while younger patients derived a greater benefit from Mast+Recon. These data inform preference-sensitive decision-making for women with early-stage breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E1096-E1102
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume278
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2023

Keywords

  • breast neoplasms
  • mastectomy
  • patient-reported outcomes measures
  • quality of life
  • radiotherapy
  • segmental

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this