Pearls and Pitfalls in Lung Cancer CT Screening

Myrna C.B. Godoy, Eduardo A.Dal Lago, Hanna R.Ferreira Dalla Pria, Girish S. Shroff, Chad D. Strange, Mylene T. Truong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Annual LDCT lung cancer screening is recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for high-risk population based on the results from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a significant (20%) reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality rate with the use of annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. More recently, the benefits of lung cancer screening were confirmed by the Dutch- Belgian NELSON trial in Europe. With the implementation of lung screening in large scale, knowledge of the limitations related to false positive, false negative and other potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis. This review outlines the most common potential pitfalls in the characterization of screen-detected lung nodules that include artifacts in LDCT, benign nodules that mimic lung cancer, and causes of false negative evaluations of lung cancer with LDCT and PET/CT studies. Awareness of the spectrum of potential pitfalls in pulmonary nodule detection and characterization, including equivocal or atypical presentations, is important for avoiding misinterpretation that can alter patient management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-256
Number of pages11
JournalSeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pearls and Pitfalls in Lung Cancer CT Screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this