Perceptions of analgesic use and side effects: What the public values in pain management

Guadalupe R. Palos, Tito R. Mendoza, Scott B. Cantor, Lu Ann Aday, Charles S. Cleeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this population-based telephone survey, we evaluated the attitudes of 302 adults toward analgesic use and related side effects. Over half (68%) reported prior experience with 2 or more side effects. Vomiting (34%), confusion (32%), and nausea (17%) were ranked as the worst side effects. Exploratory cluster analysis grouped responses to 6 questions about willingness to use analgesics into two categories. Participants in Cluster I (n = 106), "Conservatives," were less willing to take analgesics for pain as compared to those in Cluster II (n = 153), "Liberals." Univariate analysis found Hispanics, women, those less affluent or educated, and those with prior side-effect experience were more likely to be Conservative. Experience with side effects (OR = 1.3) and being female (OR = 2.1) were the strongest predictors of conservative cluster membership. To achieve better pain outcomes, clinicians and patients must identify factors that contribute to conservative decision-making about analgesic use and side effect management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)460-473
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of pain and symptom management
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Keywords

  • Pain
  • analgesic use
  • public
  • side effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of analgesic use and side effects: What the public values in pain management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this