TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance and Clinical Utility of Models Predicting Eradication of Nodal Disease in Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Tumor Biology
AU - Davis, John
AU - Hoskin, Tanya L.
AU - Day, Courtney N.
AU - Wickre, Mark
AU - Piltin, Mara A.
AU - Caudle, Abigail S.
AU - Boughey, Judy C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Introduction: Prediction models are useful to guide decision making. Our goal was to compare three published nomograms predicting axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), clinically node-positive breast cancer. Methods: Patients with cT1–T4, cN1–N3 breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. The predicted probability of pathologic node-negative (ypN0) status was estimated for each nomogram. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared across models, overall and by biologic subtype. Results: Of 581 patients, 253 (43.5%) were ypN0. ypN0 status varied by subtype: 23.9% for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), 68.9% for HER2-positive (HER2+), and 47.2% for ER-negative (ER−)/HER2−. The three nomograms had similar AUC values (0.761–0.769; p = 0.80). The Mayo model-predicted probability was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the observed probability of ypN0 status, while the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) 1- and 2-predicted probabilities were similar to the observed probability. At a predicted probability threshold of 50%, the Mayo model had the highest sensitivity (89.6%) for detecting ypN+ patients compared with MDACC models 1 and 2 (76.5%; p < 0.001). However, both MDACC models had higher specificity in identifying ypN0 status among HER2+ (81.7%) and ER−/HER2− (75.9–77.6%) patients compared with the Mayo model (59.5% and 43.1%; each p < 0.001). None of the models identified the ER+/HER2− patients with ypN0 status well at the ≥ 50% threshold (specificity 0–9.4%). Conclusion: All three models predicting nodal response to NAC performed well overall with respect to discrimination, but differed with respect to calibration and performance at a 50% probability threshold. However, none of the models performed well at the 50% threshold for ER+/HER2− patients.
AB - Introduction: Prediction models are useful to guide decision making. Our goal was to compare three published nomograms predicting axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), clinically node-positive breast cancer. Methods: Patients with cT1–T4, cN1–N3 breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. The predicted probability of pathologic node-negative (ypN0) status was estimated for each nomogram. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared across models, overall and by biologic subtype. Results: Of 581 patients, 253 (43.5%) were ypN0. ypN0 status varied by subtype: 23.9% for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), 68.9% for HER2-positive (HER2+), and 47.2% for ER-negative (ER−)/HER2−. The three nomograms had similar AUC values (0.761–0.769; p = 0.80). The Mayo model-predicted probability was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the observed probability of ypN0 status, while the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) 1- and 2-predicted probabilities were similar to the observed probability. At a predicted probability threshold of 50%, the Mayo model had the highest sensitivity (89.6%) for detecting ypN+ patients compared with MDACC models 1 and 2 (76.5%; p < 0.001). However, both MDACC models had higher specificity in identifying ypN0 status among HER2+ (81.7%) and ER−/HER2− (75.9–77.6%) patients compared with the Mayo model (59.5% and 43.1%; each p < 0.001). None of the models identified the ER+/HER2− patients with ypN0 status well at the ≥ 50% threshold (specificity 0–9.4%). Conclusion: All three models predicting nodal response to NAC performed well overall with respect to discrimination, but differed with respect to calibration and performance at a 50% probability threshold. However, none of the models performed well at the 50% threshold for ER+/HER2− patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088703567&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088703567&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-020-08885-w
DO - 10.1245/s10434-020-08885-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 32729046
AN - SCOPUS:85088703567
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 27
SP - 4678
EP - 4686
JO - Annals of surgical oncology
JF - Annals of surgical oncology
IS - 12
ER -