Peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation: Controversy remains

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The paper compares bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantations in the allogeneic setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Peripheral blood progenitor cell use has emerged as an international standard of care for hematopoietic transplantation. These cells have a different cellular composition including higher numbers of CD34 cells and markedly higher numbers of T lymphocytes. Current data support the general safety of this approach for normal transplant donors. Results consistently indicate more rapid hematopoietic recovery compared with bone marrow transplantation. This may result in improved early survival in adults with high-risk leukemias, but longer follow-up has demonstrated an increased rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease morbidity and mortality which may obviate the long-term benefit. SUMMARY: It is unclear whether peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation will produce improved disease-free or overall survival. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to resolve these controversies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-226
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent opinion in oncology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • Allogeneic transplantation
  • Bone marrow
  • Hematopoietic progenitor cells
  • Peripheral blood

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation: Controversy remains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this