TY - JOUR
T1 - Personalized sedation goal for agitated delirium in patients with cancer
T2 - Balancing comfort and communication
AU - Hui, David
AU - De La Rosa, Allison
AU - Urbauer, Diana L.
AU - Nguyen, Thuc
AU - Bruera, Eduardo
N1 - Funding Information:
Full funding for this study was provided by the National Institute of Nursing Research (R21NR016736). David Hui was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01CA214960, R01CA225701, and R01CA231471) and Helsinn. Diana L. Urbauer was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA016672).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Cancer Society.
PY - 2021/12/15
Y1 - 2021/12/15
N2 - Background: Agitated delirium is common and highly distressing. Medications are often needed to reduce agitation, but it is unclear what the desired level of sedation is. This study assessed personalized sedation goals (PSGs) and their predictors for patients in a delirium clinical trial and in clinical vignettes. Methods: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of a double-blind randomized clinical trial examining the sedative effect of chlorpromazine and/or haloperidol in patients with agitated delirium. At the baseline, caregivers and nurses were independently asked to select the PSG for the trial patient from 5 choices corresponding to Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores of 0 or higher (no sedation), –1 to –2, –3, –4, and –5 (deep sedation). Respondents also selected a PSG for 6 vignettes that differed by the level of agitation, ability to communicate, and survival. Results: Forty-two caregivers and 39 nurses answered questions regarding PSGs. For the trial patient, caregivers preferred RASS scores of –1 to –2 most often (36%), whereas nurses preferred an RASS score of –3 most often (51 %). Caregivers were significantly more likely than nurses to choose lighter sedation (odds ratio [OR], 4.8; P =.01) despite reporting greater delirium-related distress (P =.0006). Patients were undersedated 33% to 53% of the time and oversedated 0% to 15% of the time according to the PSG response criteria. In the case vignettes, deeper sedation was preferred by nurses (P <.0001) and for patients who were unable to communicate (OR, 3.1-4.4; P <.0001) and had a shorter life expectancy (OR, 1.7; P =.002). Conclusions: Caregivers often preferred lighter sedation than nurses. Many patients were undersedated in comparison with caregivers' PSGs, and this highlights room for improvement. Lay Summary: In the last days of life, many patients with cancer develop delirium and become restless/agitated; this can be highly distressing. Caregivers and physicians alike are often concerned about the use of sedatives for agitated delirium and try to find a balance between maximizing comfort and maintaining communication. This study examined the concept of a personalized sedation goal for setting an individualized target for the level of sedation. Caregivers often preferred lighter sedation than nurses. Many patients were undersedated in comparison with caregivers' stated goals, and this highlights room for improvement.
AB - Background: Agitated delirium is common and highly distressing. Medications are often needed to reduce agitation, but it is unclear what the desired level of sedation is. This study assessed personalized sedation goals (PSGs) and their predictors for patients in a delirium clinical trial and in clinical vignettes. Methods: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of a double-blind randomized clinical trial examining the sedative effect of chlorpromazine and/or haloperidol in patients with agitated delirium. At the baseline, caregivers and nurses were independently asked to select the PSG for the trial patient from 5 choices corresponding to Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores of 0 or higher (no sedation), –1 to –2, –3, –4, and –5 (deep sedation). Respondents also selected a PSG for 6 vignettes that differed by the level of agitation, ability to communicate, and survival. Results: Forty-two caregivers and 39 nurses answered questions regarding PSGs. For the trial patient, caregivers preferred RASS scores of –1 to –2 most often (36%), whereas nurses preferred an RASS score of –3 most often (51 %). Caregivers were significantly more likely than nurses to choose lighter sedation (odds ratio [OR], 4.8; P =.01) despite reporting greater delirium-related distress (P =.0006). Patients were undersedated 33% to 53% of the time and oversedated 0% to 15% of the time according to the PSG response criteria. In the case vignettes, deeper sedation was preferred by nurses (P <.0001) and for patients who were unable to communicate (OR, 3.1-4.4; P <.0001) and had a shorter life expectancy (OR, 1.7; P =.002). Conclusions: Caregivers often preferred lighter sedation than nurses. Many patients were undersedated in comparison with caregivers' PSGs, and this highlights room for improvement. Lay Summary: In the last days of life, many patients with cancer develop delirium and become restless/agitated; this can be highly distressing. Caregivers and physicians alike are often concerned about the use of sedatives for agitated delirium and try to find a balance between maximizing comfort and maintaining communication. This study examined the concept of a personalized sedation goal for setting an individualized target for the level of sedation. Caregivers often preferred lighter sedation than nurses. Many patients were undersedated in comparison with caregivers' stated goals, and this highlights room for improvement.
KW - antipsychotic agents
KW - delirium
KW - neoplasms
KW - palliative care
KW - pharmacologic therapy
KW - randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113345744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113345744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.33876
DO - 10.1002/cncr.33876
M3 - Article
C2 - 34432293
AN - SCOPUS:85113345744
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 127
SP - 4694
EP - 4701
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 24
ER -