Phase I study of weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer

Faye M. Johnson, Jonathan M. Kurie, Beverly O. Peeples, J. Jack Lee, Lei Feng, Katherine M. Pisters, Frank V. Fosella, Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou, George R. Blumenschein, Ritsuko Komaki, Bonnie S. Glisson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The combination of IP (irinotecan/cisplatin) has been shown to confer a survival benefit compared with EP (etoposide/cisplatin) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Based on this and potential synergy from sequential inhibition of topoisomerases I and II, we conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of weekly therapy alternating IP and EP. The doses of EP were fixed (etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on day 1 . The dose of irinotecan was escalated in serial cohorts at 3 dose levels: 80, 90, and 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given on days 2-5 and days 4-7 after IP and EP, respectively. Patients with limited-stage SCLC received chemoradiation during weeks 4-6 with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and thoracic radiation 1.5 Gy twice daily in 30 fractions. Patients received 12 weeks of therapy. To evaluate dose escalation in subsequent cohorts, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was initially assessed during weeks 1-3 of treatment. Characteristics of the 18 patients accrued are as follows: performance status 0/1, n = 9; female sex, n = 9; extended-stage SCLC, n = 16; and median age, 53 years. Four patients treated at irinotecan dose level 1 (80 mg/m2), 6 patients at dose level 2 (90 mg/m2), and 6 patients at dose level 3 (100 mg/m2) did not experience DLT in weeks 14 and completed therapy without major incident. The only 2 patients to experience DLT during weeks 1-4 were treated at dose level 2. Both were hospitalized during week 4 and subsequently died. However, patients had already been accrued at dose level 3 and tolerated therapy well. Therefore, the trial design was modified to assess DLT during weeks 1-4, and additional patients were cautiously added to the dose level 2 and 3 cohorts. Analysis of summary toxicity data resulted in a recommendation that dose level 3 be used in phase II based on the probability of DLT of 16% (95% CI, 3%-29%). Responses in 16 evaluable patients include complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 14 patients, and minor response in 1 patient. With the exception of the 2 deaths, the therapy was well tolerated and active. Phase II evaluation of the regimen in patients with extensive-stage SCLC is ongoing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-45
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Lung Cancer
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003

Keywords

  • Extensive-stage disease
  • Limited-stage disease
  • Neutropenia
  • Radiation therapy
  • Thrombocytopenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase I study of weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this