Positron emission tomography-computed tomography reporting in radiation therapy planning and response assessment

Eric M. Rohren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Quality reporting in radiology and nuclear medicine has been described in 8 Cs: correctness, completeness, consistency, communication, clarity, confidence, concision, and consultation. The incorporation of all of these elements is necessary for the generation of high-quality, effective reports. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography presents a particular challenge because of the large amount of information contained in a single study, both anatomic and metabolic. In this article, the elements of good reporting will be reviewed with specific attention to positron emission tomography-computed tomography, including specific case examples that demonstrate effective and ineffective reporting styles. The principles of reporting will then be applied specifically to reporting for radiotherapy planning and reporting for response assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)516-529
Number of pages14
JournalSeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positron emission tomography-computed tomography reporting in radiation therapy planning and response assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this