Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Jordan Kaplan, Ryan D. Wagner, Tara L. Braun, Carrie Chu, Sebastian J. Winocour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prepectoral breast reconstruction was first done in the early 1960s; however, while initial results were promising, high complication rates led surgeons to move toward submuscular implant placement. We soon came to find that submuscular implant placement was not without its own set of drawbacks. Surgeons have since revisited the efficacy of prepectoral breast reconstruction in light of new surgical and technological advances. Following these advancements, complication profiles for prepectoral breast reconstruction have drastically improved. Despite this change, surgeons recognize that prepectoral implant placement is not for everyone and patient selection is critical to success. As increasing numbers of these procedures continue to be done, we must now look to conduct direct comparisons between submuscular and prepectoral breast implant placement so that surgeons can make evidence-based decisions on patient selection and operative planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)236-239
Number of pages4
JournalSeminars in Plastic Surgery
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • breast reconstruction
  • prepectoral
  • subcutaneous approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this