TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of the CHEK2 R95* germline mutation
AU - Knappskog, Stian
AU - Leirvaag, Beryl
AU - Gansmo, Liv B.
AU - Romundstad, Pål
AU - Hveem, Kristian
AU - Vatten, Lars
AU - Lønning, Per E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The present study was supported by grants from the Norwegian Cancer Society, the Norwegian Research Council, the Bergen Research Foundation and the Norwegian Health Region West. The funding bodies did not have any saying with regards to study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or in writing of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s).
PY - 2016/9/27
Y1 - 2016/9/27
N2 - Background: While germline CHEK2 mutations have been linked to a moderately elevated cancer risk, to date, a limited number of such mutations have been identified. Recently, we reported a germline nonsense mutation (C283T; R95*), introducing an early stop-codon, in two Norwegian patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer. Both patients were resistant to anthracycline therapy, resembling what has been observed for TP53 mutations. Methods: In the present study, we screened a large population based sample, including 3748 non-cancer individuals and 7081 incident cancer cases (breast cancer, n = 1717; prostate cancer n = 2501, lung cancer n = 1331 and colorectal cancer n = 1532), for the distribution of CHEK2 R95*. Results: We found that 12 individuals (0.11 %) carried the R95* variant: 4 non-cancer individuals (0.11 %), 4 breast cancer cases (0.23 %), and 4 prostate cancer cases (0.16 %). Although the low number of observations precluded formal statistical assessment, our data may indicate an elevated risk for breast (OR: 2.19, 95 % CI: 0.55-8.75) and prostate cancer (OR: 1.5, 95 % CI: 0.36-6.00) associated with CHEK2 R95*. By mining international databanks, we found no individuals carrying the R95* mutation, indicating it to be restricted to the Norwegian population. Conclusion: We provide proof-of-concept that previously unknown CHEK2 germline mutations may be present in certain populations. Notably, germline mutations in tumours are in general missed by contemporary massive parallel sequencing strategies, since tumour mutations are usually filtered against the germline. The fact that the CHEK2 R95* mutation may be associated with resistance to anthracyclines in cancer patients emphasizes its possible clinical importance.
AB - Background: While germline CHEK2 mutations have been linked to a moderately elevated cancer risk, to date, a limited number of such mutations have been identified. Recently, we reported a germline nonsense mutation (C283T; R95*), introducing an early stop-codon, in two Norwegian patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer. Both patients were resistant to anthracycline therapy, resembling what has been observed for TP53 mutations. Methods: In the present study, we screened a large population based sample, including 3748 non-cancer individuals and 7081 incident cancer cases (breast cancer, n = 1717; prostate cancer n = 2501, lung cancer n = 1331 and colorectal cancer n = 1532), for the distribution of CHEK2 R95*. Results: We found that 12 individuals (0.11 %) carried the R95* variant: 4 non-cancer individuals (0.11 %), 4 breast cancer cases (0.23 %), and 4 prostate cancer cases (0.16 %). Although the low number of observations precluded formal statistical assessment, our data may indicate an elevated risk for breast (OR: 2.19, 95 % CI: 0.55-8.75) and prostate cancer (OR: 1.5, 95 % CI: 0.36-6.00) associated with CHEK2 R95*. By mining international databanks, we found no individuals carrying the R95* mutation, indicating it to be restricted to the Norwegian population. Conclusion: We provide proof-of-concept that previously unknown CHEK2 germline mutations may be present in certain populations. Notably, germline mutations in tumours are in general missed by contemporary massive parallel sequencing strategies, since tumour mutations are usually filtered against the germline. The fact that the CHEK2 R95* mutation may be associated with resistance to anthracyclines in cancer patients emphasizes its possible clinical importance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988813546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988813546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13053-016-0059-0
DO - 10.1186/s13053-016-0059-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 27708748
AN - SCOPUS:84988813546
SN - 1731-2302
VL - 14
JO - Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
JF - Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
IS - 1
M1 - 19
ER -