Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research

Alexander D. Sherry, Kelsey L. Corrigan, Ramez Kouzy, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Yumeng Yang, Roshal R. Patel, Douglas J. Totten, Neil B. Newman, Prajnan Das, Cullen Taniguchi, Bruce Minsky, Rebecca A. Snyder, C. David Fuller, Ethan Ludmir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although most patients with cancer are treated with local therapy (LT), the proportion of late-phase clinical trials investigating local therapeutic interventions is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion, characteristics, and trends of phase 3 cancer clinical trials assessing the therapeutic value of LT over time. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of interventional randomized controlled trials in oncology published from 2002 through 2020 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends and characteristics of LT trials were compared to all other trials. Results: Of 1877 trials screened, 794 trials enrolling 584,347 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 trials (3%) included a primary randomization assessing LT compared with 767 trials (97%) investigating systemic therapy or supportive care. Annual increase in the number of LT trials (slope [m] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.39; p <.001) was outpaced by the increase of trials testing systemic therapy or supportive care (m = 7.57; 95% CI, 6.03–9.11; p <.001). LT trials were more often sponsored by cooperative groups (22 of 27 [81%] vs. 211 of 767 [28%]; p <.001) and less often sponsored by industry (5 of 27 [19%] vs. 609 of 767 [79%]; p <.001). LT trials were more likely to use overall survival as primary end point compared to other trials (13 of 27 [48%] vs. 199 of 767 [26%]; p =.01). Conclusions: In contemporary late-phase oncology research, LT trials are increasingly under-represented, under-funded, and evaluate more challenging end points compared to other modalities. These findings strongly argue for greater resource allocation and funding mechanisms for LT clinical trials. Plain language summary: Most people who have cancer receive treatments directed at the site of their cancer, such as surgery or radiation. We do not know, however, how many trials test surgery or radiation compared to drug treatments (that go all over the body). We reviewed trials testing the most researched strategies (phase 3) completed between 2002 and 2020. Only 27 trials tested local treatments like surgery or radiation compared to 767 trials testing other treatments. Our study has important implications for funding research and understanding cancer research priorities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3430-3438
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume129
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2023

Keywords

  • medical oncology
  • palliative care
  • phase 3 clinical trials
  • radiation oncology
  • randomized controlled trial
  • surgical oncology
  • trial design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this