Prognostic factors in stage II endometrial carcinoma

Dale M. Larson, Larry J. Copeland, H. Stephen Gallager, J. Taylor Wharton, David M. Gershenson, Creighton L. Edwards, John M. Malone, Felix N. Rutledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rarity of Stage II endometrial carcinoma and variable treatment modalities have made the evaluation of prognostic factors difficult. Clinical, surgical, and pathologic characteristics were evaluated in 64 patients treated with whole pelvic irradiation and intracavitary radium followed by hysterectomy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute from January 1965 to December 1983. Comparison of 5‐year actuarial survival rates revealed the following statistically significant categories: age, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, disease extent at surgery including lymph node metastases, and pelvic cytology. Race, weight, and cell type were not significant prognostic factors. Evaluation of prognostic factors at surgery includes pelvic and para‐aortic lymph node biopsies, omental biopsy, pelvic cytologic washings, and biopsy of any suspicious tissues. Patients with adverse prognostic factors are candidates for trials with adjuvant therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1358-1361
Number of pages4
JournalCancer
Volume60
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors in stage II endometrial carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this