Abstract
Most propensity score (PS) analysis methods rely on a correctly specified parametric PS model, which may result in biased estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) when the model is misspecified. More flexible nonparametric models for treatment assignment alleviate this issue, but they do not always guarantee covariate balance. Methods that force balance in the means of covariates and their transformations between the treatment groups, termed global balance in this article, do not always lead to unbiased estimation of ATE. Their estimated propensity scores only ensure global balance but not the balancing property, which is defined as the conditional independence between treatment assignment and covariates given the propensity score. The balancing property implies not only global balance but also local balance—the mean balance of covariates in propensity score stratified sub-populations. Local balance implies global balance, but the reverse is false. We propose the propensity score with local balance (PSLB) methodology, which incorporates nonparametric propensity score models and optimizes local balance. Extensive numerical studies showed that the proposed method can substantially outperform existing methods that estimate the propensity score by optimizing global balance, when the model is misspecified. The proposed method is implemented in the R package PSLB.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2637-2660 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Statistics in Medicine |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 15 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 10 2023 |
Keywords
- average treatment effect
- causal inference
- covariate balance
- inverse propensity score weighting
- kernel method
- parameter tuning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Epidemiology
- Statistics and Probability
MD Anderson CCSG core facilities
- Biostatistics Resource Group