TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer
AU - Buzdar, Aman U.
AU - Singletary, S. Eva
AU - Theriault, Richard L.
AU - Booser, Daniel J.
AU - Valero, Vicente
AU - Ibrahim, Nuhad
AU - Smith, Terry L.
AU - Asmar, Lina
AU - Frye, Debra
AU - Manuel, Nikki
AU - Kau, Shu Wan
AU - McNeese, Marsha
AU - Strom, Eric
AU - Hunt, Kelly
AU - Ames, Frederick
AU - Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1999/11
Y1 - 1999/11
N2 - Purpose: To compare prospectively the antitumor activity of single-agent paclitaxel to the three-drug combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with T1-3N0-1M0 disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) as 24-hour infusion or FAC in standard doses at every-3-week intervals. Each patient was treated with four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. Results: A total of 174 patients were registered, and 87 were randomized to each arm of the study. Clinical response, ie, complete and partial responses, was similar in both arms of the study. Three patients in the FAC arm and one patient in the paclitaxel subgroup had progressive disease. The extent of residual disease by intent- to-treat analysis at the time of surgery was similar between the two arms of the study. Conclusion: The results of this prospective study demonstrated that single-agent paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy has significant antitumor activity, and this was clinically comparable to FAC. Similar fractions of patients had clinical complete and partial responses, and very few patients had no response to either therapy. The value of alternate non-cross-resistant therapies as used in this protocol on the clinical course of this disease would require longer follow-up.
AB - Purpose: To compare prospectively the antitumor activity of single-agent paclitaxel to the three-drug combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with T1-3N0-1M0 disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) as 24-hour infusion or FAC in standard doses at every-3-week intervals. Each patient was treated with four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. Results: A total of 174 patients were registered, and 87 were randomized to each arm of the study. Clinical response, ie, complete and partial responses, was similar in both arms of the study. Three patients in the FAC arm and one patient in the paclitaxel subgroup had progressive disease. The extent of residual disease by intent- to-treat analysis at the time of surgery was similar between the two arms of the study. Conclusion: The results of this prospective study demonstrated that single-agent paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy has significant antitumor activity, and this was clinically comparable to FAC. Similar fractions of patients had clinical complete and partial responses, and very few patients had no response to either therapy. The value of alternate non-cross-resistant therapies as used in this protocol on the clinical course of this disease would require longer follow-up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032751112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032751112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3412
DO - 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3412
M3 - Article
C2 - 10550135
AN - SCOPUS:0032751112
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 17
SP - 3412
EP - 3417
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -