TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological aspects of donor insemination
T2 - Evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples
AU - Schover, L. R.
AU - Collins, R. L.
AU - Richards, S.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the utility of psychological screening for couples entering a donor insemination program. Design: Each spouse completed questionnaires. A psychologist reviewed them and rated the psychological fitness of the couple for participation in the program. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to each couple at a mean of 11 months after entry into the program. Setting: Applicants for donor insemination were studied in an infertility program in a large, tertiary referral center. Patients, Participants: Consecutive applicants to enter the donor insemination program were required to participate in the initial evaluation. Interventions: Couples judged by the psychologist to be at risk for a poor psychological outcome had an assessment and counseling interview with the psychologist before proceeding with insemination. Main Outcome Measures: Initially, the Stress and Infertility Questionnaire measured specific anxieties related to donor insemination, marital and sexual impact, and attitudes about confidentiality; the Brief Symptom Inventory measured psychological distress; and the Dyadic Adjustment Inventory assessed marital satisfaction. At follow- up, 48% of couples returned a modified version of the Stress and Infertility Questionnaire and the other two questionnaires. Results: The psychologist's rating was predictive of pregnancy rates (59% for excellent candidates, 41% for acceptable couples, and 14% for couples psychologically at risk). At-risk couples were more likely to drop out of the program (50% versus only 20% of other couples). Sexual problems were reported by 59% of women and 53% of men. Couples believed that a child should not be told of the donor insemination (74% of wives and 80% of husbands). Initially, 64% of wives and 70% of husbands chose total secrecy with families or friends, and these attitudes shifted little over time. Conclusion: This screening procedure is cost- effective and suggests that psychological intervention should be attempted with at-risk couples.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the utility of psychological screening for couples entering a donor insemination program. Design: Each spouse completed questionnaires. A psychologist reviewed them and rated the psychological fitness of the couple for participation in the program. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to each couple at a mean of 11 months after entry into the program. Setting: Applicants for donor insemination were studied in an infertility program in a large, tertiary referral center. Patients, Participants: Consecutive applicants to enter the donor insemination program were required to participate in the initial evaluation. Interventions: Couples judged by the psychologist to be at risk for a poor psychological outcome had an assessment and counseling interview with the psychologist before proceeding with insemination. Main Outcome Measures: Initially, the Stress and Infertility Questionnaire measured specific anxieties related to donor insemination, marital and sexual impact, and attitudes about confidentiality; the Brief Symptom Inventory measured psychological distress; and the Dyadic Adjustment Inventory assessed marital satisfaction. At follow- up, 48% of couples returned a modified version of the Stress and Infertility Questionnaire and the other two questionnaires. Results: The psychologist's rating was predictive of pregnancy rates (59% for excellent candidates, 41% for acceptable couples, and 14% for couples psychologically at risk). At-risk couples were more likely to drop out of the program (50% versus only 20% of other couples). Sexual problems were reported by 59% of women and 53% of men. Couples believed that a child should not be told of the donor insemination (74% of wives and 80% of husbands). Initially, 64% of wives and 70% of husbands chose total secrecy with families or friends, and these attitudes shifted little over time. Conclusion: This screening procedure is cost- effective and suggests that psychological intervention should be attempted with at-risk couples.
KW - Donor insemination
KW - adjustment
KW - attitudes
KW - psychological evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026602936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026602936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54904-8
DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54904-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 1740202
AN - SCOPUS:0026602936
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 57
SP - 583
EP - 590
JO - Fertility and sterility
JF - Fertility and sterility
IS - 3
ER -