Randomized phase II/III confirmatory treatment selection design with a change of survival end points: Statistical design of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1216

Qiang (Ed) Zhang, Qian Wu, Paul M. Harari, David I. Rosenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: To confirm the treatment effects of concurrent cetuximab plus docetaxel observed in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0234 and single out the effect of cetuximab, we designed RTOG 1216, a randomized phase II/III study, which uses an intermediate end point to select the best regimen for definitive testing of survival benefit. Methods: In phase II, the best regimen should demonstrate statistically significant efficacy against the control with predefined advantage over the competing arm regarding disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluate operating characteristics of the randomized II/III group sequential design through simulations and numerical integrations under the null and various alternative hypotheses. Results: Results show the randomized II/III design yields substantial savings on sample size and time with well-controlled type I and type II error rates. Conclusion: Overall, the proposed randomized II/III design has desirable properties that offer cost effectiveness, operational efficiency, and, most importantly, scientific innovation that can be considered for similar clinical research settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-45
Number of pages9
JournalHead and Neck
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • head and neck
  • oncology
  • randomized II/III design
  • survival
  • treatment selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Clinical Trials Office

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized phase II/III confirmatory treatment selection design with a change of survival end points: Statistical design of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1216'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this