Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy

Stephen H. Culp, Rian J. Dickstein, H. Barton Grossman, Shanna M. Pretzsch, Sima Porten, Siamak Daneshmand, Jie Cai, Susan Groshen, Arlene Siefker-Radtke, Randall E. Millikan, Bogdan Czerniak, Neema Navai, Matthew F. Wszolek, Ashish M. Kamat, Colin P.N. Dinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

147 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the survival of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy to confirm the utility of existing clinical tools to identify low risk patients who could be treated with radical cystectomy alone and a high risk group most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: We identified patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Patients were considered high risk based on the clinical presence of hydroureteronephrosis, cT3b-T4a disease, and/or histological evidence of lymphovascular invasion, micropapillary or neuroendocrine features on transurethral resection. We evaluated survival (disease specific, progression-free and overall) and rate of pathological up staging. An independent cohort of patients from another institution was used to confirm our findings. Results: We identified 98 high risk and 199 low risk patients eligible for analysis. High risk patients exhibited decreased 5-year overall survival (47.0% vs 64.8%) and decreased disease specific (64.3% vs 83.5%) and progression-free (62.0% vs 84.1%) survival probabilities compared to low risk patients (p <0.001). Survival outcomes were confirmed in the validation subset. On final pathology 49.2% of low risk patients had disease up staged. Conclusions: The 5-year disease specific survival of low risk patients was greater than 80%, supporting the distinction of high risk and low risk muscle invasive bladder cancer. The presence of high risk features identifies patients with a poor prognosis who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while many of those with low risk disease can undergo surgery up front with good expectations and avoid chemotherapy associated toxicity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-47
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume191
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Keywords

  • cystectomy
  • neoadjuvant therapy
  • outcomes assessment
  • risk
  • urinary bladder neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Clinical Trials Office

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this