Regional anesthesia and the acute pain service: Compliance and controversies

Keith A. May, Jack M. Craven, Crystal Wright, Bryant Tran

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of reviewThe aims of this article are three-fold: first, to describe the necessary elements that result in accurate and compliant billing practice; second, to discuss billing in the context of new blocks and liposomal bupivacaine; and third, to gain a better understanding of compliance law.Recent findingsRegional anesthesia techniques provide an appealing alternative to opioid medication for pain management. However, these techniques also increase the cost of care. As new peripheral and fascial plane blocks emerge, proper coding has become more complex.SummaryFamiliarity with documentation, billing, and compliance requirements can help maintain proper reimbursement rates, as well as limit potential downstream consequences. Most importantly this can help increase the viability and success of an acute pain service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-229
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2022

Keywords

  • billing
  • compliance
  • documentation
  • regional anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional anesthesia and the acute pain service: Compliance and controversies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this