Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: Why is there no standard of care?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Relapse after achieving a prior response remains one of the most important obstacles to improving the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although overall, the majority of patients with disease relapse do poorly, this is by no means uniform and a number of predictors of outcome have been identified. Previously, most trials of investigational agents in the setting of disease relapse in AML have accrued a wide range of patients with widely different patient and disease characteristics. With increased understanding of the biology of the neoplastic change in AML, and better identification of disease subsets based on their molecular characterization, target-specific novel agents are being developed that will hopefully lead to better strategies, not only for treating relapsed disease, but also for the initial induction treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-259
Number of pages7
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • acute myeloid leukemia
  • biology
  • relapse
  • targeted therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: Why is there no standard of care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this