Abstract
This study investigated whether temptations not to be physically active (PA) contribute to the explanation of PA, controlling for self-efficacy. A cross-sectional random sample (n=700; 63.3% Female; Mean age=47, SD=17.1) completed a computer assisted telephone interview assessing temptations, self-efficacy, and PA behavior. A two-factor (affect and competing demands) temptations model fit the data (χ2 = 70.91, df = 13, p < .0001, RMSEA = .08, CFI = 0.98). The model relating temptations scales with PA, controlling for self-efficacy, also fit the data (χ2 = 240.06, df = 72, p < .0001, RMSEA = .06, CFI = 0.96). There were statistically significant paths from self-efficacy with PA (γ = .43), but paths from temptations were not significant (p>.05). Temptations did not account for variation in PA behavior beyond that explained by self-efficacy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 230-243 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- Measurement
- Multi-ethnic
- Physical activity
- Self-efficacy
- Temptations
- Transtheoretical model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Applied Psychology