Retaining Hope While Respecting Patients’ Presumed Wishes: How Substituted Judgement Can Help

Natalie Hardy, Nico Nortje

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is not uncommon for families to wait in hopes of receiving test results that show a treatable mutation, such as in the case of lung cancer. Waiting for such test results can distract families from focusing on a patient’s current pain and suffering, especially when families experience heightened emotions and anticipatory grief. The substituted judgement standard can be helpful in resolving ethical dilemmas by encouraging families to think about what decision a patient would have made if competent, thus preventing unnecessary pain and suffering. This case study sheds light on how the substituted judgement standard was used with a patient’s family and how the family’s hope for a treatable mutation affected their perception of the patient’s clinical condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-145
Number of pages3
JournalCanadian Journal of Bioethics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • decision making
  • ethics
  • lung cancer
  • substituted judgement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retaining Hope While Respecting Patients’ Presumed Wishes: How Substituted Judgement Can Help'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this